| . | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
22nd April 2005 The BBC's Magic QuotesOr how to make unsubstantiated claims against our official enemies.by: Antony Wright On March 30th the Media Advocacy group, Medialens, issued a Media Alert – ‘But The Generals Love Napalm’. The alert questioned the failure of the BBC to investigate reports of US atrocities during their assault on the city of Falluja, specifically alleged evidence of war crimes. BBC Director of News Helen Boaden, in her response, stated that it was vital that these reports are independently verified. Too right Helen, the BBC can’t go round making unsubstantiated claims. Unless of course they liberally throw quotes and the word alleged into the article and then they can publish whatever they want. Oh and don’t forget the one liner at the end refuting the claims. Job done! Or is that damage done? Of course there is one more rule and that is that this approach should only be used against our official enemies. That is why yesterday the BBC published an article entitled - Burma 'used chemicals on rebels'. See, there are those magic quotes, concentrate or you will miss them; actually that’s the idea. The article goes on to say
Wow an international human rights group, that is very heavy weight. Later the article reports
Gosh evidence, how can you start to doubt this story? And there’s more
He concluded that their symptoms were synonymous with exposure to some form of chemical attack. And now for the one liner
Yeah whatever, we all know the Burmese government are bad guys so they must be lying. With my curiosity roused by this article I decided to get some background information on Christian Solidarity Worldwide, it’s none to pretty I’m afraid. Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) who also go by the title Christian Solidarity International (CSI) - has a pretty grubby track record by all accounts In Sudan, which has a horrific underlying slavery and abduction problem exacerbated by the conflict, CSW are involved in the practice of slave redemption, the buying and setting free of slaves. John Harker the Canadian government’s special envoy to Sudan in his report, “Human Security in Sudan: The Report of a Canadian Assessment Mission” [pdf], uncovered testimony that implicated CSW in fake redemptions, where people posing as slaves where purchased from Sudanese Peoples Liberation Army (SPLA) members dressed as Arabs, the money going to fund the ongoing conflict. For the CSW, a fundamentalist Christian group, this had the added benefit of demonising Muslims as well as funding the arms purchases of their allies. This close relationship between the CSW and SPLA rebels in Sudan was publicly revealed when the CSW used John Garang, head of the SPLA, to represent it before the UN commission on Human Rights. The result was that their UN NGO accreditation was withdrawn. Lastly, following a press release by Norwegian People's aid (NPA),
that chemical weapons had been used in bombing by Sudanese Government
forces, Baroness Cox then President of CSW repeated the claim in the
British House of Lords and offered samples of soil, water and shrapnel
as evidence.
None of these people, or the eyewitness testimony they have gathered, is worthy of the BBC quote treatment. Perhaps things would be different if the victims were American and the alleged perpetrators Muslim |
![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| © copyright 2008 Media Lens | site built by OmWeb |